Reacreditation

The Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences is regionally accredited by the New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE), which accredits institutions as a whole rather than individual programs. This page provides information about the accreditation process and key milestones. Please check back regularly for updates.

Current Accreditation Status

Colleges and universities in the New England region undergo a regular ten-year review cycle conducted by the New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE). MCPHS most recently received regional re-accreditation following an on-site visit in 2017. In 2022, the University completed its required five-year interim report, which NECHE subsequently reviewed and accepted. In accordance with NECHE policy, the Commission has scheduled MCPHS’s next comprehensive ten-year evaluation for spring 2027. As part of this process, the University will complete a self-study in fall 2026, and an NECHE evaluation team is scheduled to visit campus in March 14-17, 2027.

NECHE also publishes frequently asked questions (FAQs) about accreditation.

Accreditation Standards Committee Strategic Priority 12

The Accreditation Standards Committee meets twice each year, in April and October, to guide the University’s regional accreditation efforts. Beginning in 2025, committee members organized into subcommittees aligned with the NECHE accreditation standards to support the development of the University’s comprehensive self-study. Throughout the year, these subcommittees met regularly, shared working documents on a collaborative TeamSite, and identified supporting materials and evidence.

The Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness, in partnership with the Provost’s Office, is leading the preparation of the self-study and coordinating the collection and organization of supporting evidence. More than a report, the self-study is a campus-wide process that invites reflection, collaboration, and shared inquiry into the University’s strengths, opportunities, and ongoing improvement.

The MCPHS Site Visit Schedule will be coming in fall 2026.  For questions about the regional accreditation process contact the Office of the Provost, Dr. Henriette Pranger, Henriette.Pranger@mcphs.edu, Associate Provost for Institutional Research and Effectiveness.

The institution’s mission defines its distinctive character, provides direction for institutional activities, and forms the basis for institutional planning, resource allocation, assessment, and improvement. The organization has a system of governance, internal and at the Board level, that facilitates the accomplishment of its mission, supports effective planning and evaluation, and promotes institutional improvement and innovation. The institution has sufficient autonomy and control of its programs and operations to be held accountable for meeting the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation.

  • Sue Gorman
  • Stephen Kerr
  • Jeanine Mount
  • Riette Pranger
  • Laura Uerling
  • Barbara Macaulay
  • Trisha Lapointe

The institution’s academic and co-curricular programs are consistent with and serve to fulfill its mission and purposes. The institution works systematically and effectively to plan, provide, oversee, evaluate, improve, and assure the quality and integrity of its academic programs and credits and degrees awarded, as well as its co-curricular programs. The institution sets a standard of student achievement appropriate to the degree or certificate awarded and develops systematic means to understand how and what students are learning and to use the evidence provided to improve the academic program.

  • Anna Morin
  • Carol Stuckey
  • Delia Anderson
  • Dennis Moseman
  • Michael Spooner
  • Stacey Taylor
  • Craig Mack
  • Garland Mann Lamb
  • Jacinda Felix Haro
  • Eric Thompson
  • Stephen Lukens
  • Evan Maloney
  • Susan Gorman
  • Amanda Morrill
  • Keri Griffin
  • Lisa Irish
  • Daniel Jamous
  • Ronny Priefer
  • Sara McCord

The institution has and maintains sufficient human, financial, information, physical, and technological resources and capacity to support its mission wherever and however its academic programs are offered. Through periodic evaluation, the institution demonstrates that its resources are sufficient to sustain the quality of its educational program and to support institutional improvement now and in the future. The institution demonstrates, through verifiable internal and external evidence, its financial capacity to graduate its entering class. The institution administers its resources in an ethical manner, ensuring effective systems of enterprise risk management, regulatory compliance, and internal controls.

  • Keith Bellucci
  • Kevin Dolan
  • Seth Wall
  • Pat Zeller
  • Tom Scanlon

The institution demonstrates its educational effectiveness and the success of all students by ensuring appropriate levels of student achievement on mission-appropriate student outcomes. Based on sustained, evidence-based reflection and study, the institution employs comprehensive quality assurance processes to improve institutional effectiveness and student learning and success.

  • Laura Uerling
  • Kate Bresonis
  • Mathew Konieczka
  • Tammy Gravel

Through its commitment to ethical practices, transparency, and accountability, the institution upholds high standards in all its operations. It provides complete, accurate, timely, and accessible information to all constituents, including the public and the Commission.

  • Charlie Breckling
  • Clara Reynolds